Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 640 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1150MHz vs 1100MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Plus Graphics 640 +14%
0.845 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.736 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jun 2013
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
40
6
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
1.690 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
-
-
-
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Generation 7.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm++
Process Size
22 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy