Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs AMD FirePro A320

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs AMD FirePro A320

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 580 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 100W)
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (955MHz vs 950MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 580 +49%
1.094 TFLOPS
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

350 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
576
Shading Units
384
72
TMUs
24
9
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

8.550 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
68.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
273.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Skylake GT4e
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A320
Generation 9.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm+
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy