CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
VS
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 580 and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 580
+1102%
1.094 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 580
VS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Sep 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
350 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
48
72
TMUs
16
9
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
8.550 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
68.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
273.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Skylake GT4e
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
Generation 9.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
14 nm+
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Board Design
15W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
2
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs AMD Radeon Vega 9 Mobile
3
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Intel Iris Graphics 6100
4
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
5
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs AMD Radeon HD 6520G IGP
6
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs ATI Radeon 3100 IGP
7
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Intel GMA X4700MHD
8
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs AMD Radeon HD 6620G IGP
9
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630
10
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy