Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 580 and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 580 +1102%
1.094 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

350 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
48
72
TMUs
16
9
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

8.550 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
68.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
273.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Skylake GT4e
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
Generation 9.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
14 nm+
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy