Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile vs AMD FirePro A320

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile vs AMD FirePro A320

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1300MHz vs 955MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile +172%
1.997 TFLOPS
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
3.994 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Raptor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A320
Generation 12.2
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy