Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 8300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1400MHz
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU +4379%
2.15 TFLOPS
GeForce 8300
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2007
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 8 IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
4.301 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Alder Lake GT1
GPU Name
C78
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.2
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
-
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy