Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Intel HD Graphics 3000

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Intel HD Graphics 3000

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
672 additional rendering cores
Intel HD Graphics 3000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1300MHz vs 1100MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU +578%
1.69 TFLOPS
HD Graphics 3000
0.249 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2020
Release Date
Feb 2011
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
650 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
12
24
ROPs
2
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
3.379 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.690 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
249.6 GFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tiger Lake GT2
GPU Name
Sandy Bridge GT2+
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Generation 6.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.16 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
216 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy