Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 6200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
+100%
1.69 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
0.845 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
+132%
1292
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
556
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
+116%
612
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
283
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Sep 2014
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
0 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
3.379 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.690 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
844.8 GFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Tiger Lake GT2
GPU Name
Broadwell GT3e
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Generation 8.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
146 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
