CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs ATI Radeon 3000 IGP
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs ATI Radeon 3000 IGP
VS
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
ATI Radeon 3000 IGP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 3000 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
+5935%
1.69 TFLOPS
Radeon 3000 IGP
0.028 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
VS
Radeon 3000 IGP
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Jan 2009
HD Graphics-M
Generation
TeraScale IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.400 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.400 GTexel/s
3.379 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.690 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.00 GFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Tiger Lake GT2
GPU Name
RS780
-
GPU Variant
RS780L
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
-
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.18 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²
Board Design
15W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon 610M vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
2
Intel UHD Graphics 64EU vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
3
AMD Radeon Vega 7 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
5
Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
6
AMD Radeon 780M vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
7
AMD Radeon 680M vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
8
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs AMD Radeon 780M
9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Intel GMA 500
10
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy