Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (1650MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics +251%
2.534 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Oct 2014
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Topaz
-
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.55 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy