Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (204.8GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1163MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB +86%
3.333 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2023
Release Date
Apr 2016
Tegra
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
204.8GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
32
56
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
52.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
6.666 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.333 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
1.667 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.94 billion
Unknown
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy