Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA GRID K200

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA GRID K200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (10W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
GRID K200 +257%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
Tegra
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
34.14GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
16
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
1280 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
640.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
320.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy