Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (34.14GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB +11%
0.64 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tegra
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
34.14GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
16
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
1280 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
640.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
320.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy