CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
VS
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
+18%
1.28 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
VS
Quadro K3100M
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tegra
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
32
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
15W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
2
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
3
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
4
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
5
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A4500
6
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe
7
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
8
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
9
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy