Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1.28 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +4690%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2023
Tegra
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
48GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
96
1024
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
384
16
ROPs
192
32
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
57.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
295W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy