NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Jetson Orin NX 16 GB and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
+476%
1.88 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
Tegra
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
32
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
29.38 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
3.760 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.880 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
940.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GK107
TE980M-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
