Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Jetson Orin NX 16 GB and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
1.88 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +3161%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2023
Release Date
Apr 2023
Tegra
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
48GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
96
1024
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
384
16
ROPs
192
32
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
29.38 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
3.760 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
1.880 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
940.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
Navi 31
TE980M-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
57.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
295W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy