Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA L4 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA L4 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM L4 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA L4 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 86% (2040MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 72W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
L4 +2055%
30.29 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
L4
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Dec 2015
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

795 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
300.1GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
60
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
640
240
TMUs
40
80
ROPs
16
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

163.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
30.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
30.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
473.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

72W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GM107
AD104-???-A1
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy