Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 150% (1400MHz vs 560MHz)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP
0.044 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU +4786%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
TeraScale IGP
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCI
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

500 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
560 MHz
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
2.240 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.301 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RS880
GPU Name
Alder Lake GT1
RS880M
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.2
-
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
Unknown
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy