Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 565v and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 20W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 565v
0.432 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250 +84%
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Unknown
M9x
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
320
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M96
GPU Name
GP108B
M96 XT (216-0729051)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy