Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.67GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
16 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2010
M5x
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
667 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
10.67GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
48.96 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
14W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

M56
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
N11M-GE1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy