Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce 920M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 920M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Mar 2015
M5x
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
33W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

M56
GPU Name
GK208B
-
GPU Variant
N16V-GM
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy