Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.67GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
40 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2007
M5x
Generation
M7x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
-
Shading Units
40
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.800 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
36.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

M56
GPU Name
M72
-
GPU Variant
M72-S (216QSAKA12FG)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy