Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 vs AMD FirePro M4000

ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 vs AMD FirePro M4000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X2300 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.272GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
M6x
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
392 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.272GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.916 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
1.916 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
33W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M64
GPU Name
Chelsea
M64-M (216PVAVA12FG)
GPU Variant
Chelsea XT GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy