Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X2300 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 6.272GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jan 2011
M6x
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
392 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.272GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
-
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.916 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.148 GPixel/s
1.916 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.592 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
110.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
9.176 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
12W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

M64
GPU Name
GF119
M64-M (216PVAVA12FG)
GPU Variant
N12M-GS
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy