Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX +440%
11.07 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Jun 2021
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1024
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net