Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD FirePro D300

Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
FirePro D300 +6%
2.176 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Jan 2014
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net