Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +289%
7.987 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Mar 2016
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net