Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+166%
2.048 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
