Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+485%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Feb 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1024
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
