Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+4451%
2.048 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
G96C
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.314 billion
Unknown
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
