Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+1948%
2.048 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.292 billion
Unknown
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
