Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock1725MHz
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +115%
4.416 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Nov 2019
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
1024
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net