Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
+39%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Jun 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
10.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
