Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+282%
2.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
1024
Shading Units
216
64
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
