Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+6300%
2.048 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
40
64
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.181 billion
Unknown
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
