Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 171W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+282%
2.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
1024
Shading Units
216
64
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
