Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+160%
5.345 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Unknown
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2880
64
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.5
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
