Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285X +100%
4.104 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Unknown
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.06 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.3 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.104 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net