Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Lower TDP (35W vs 215W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
+342%
9.062 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Jul 2019
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1605 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
283.2 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.12 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.062 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
283.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
215W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-410-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
13.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
