Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
18432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+3890%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Oct 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
19456
64
TMUs
1216
64
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
153 billion
Unknown
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
N/A
