Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon R7 240

Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M +310%
2.048 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
Unknown
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net