Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+2042%
10.65 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2007
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
16
256
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.666 billion
Unknown
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
