Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+8029%
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2010
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.66GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
4096
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
16
256
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
130.6 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216-305-A3
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
