Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 84.10GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1518MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+356%
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
2.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2018
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1392 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1518 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
84.10GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
256
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.43 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.86 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
36.43 GFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.332 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.86 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-301-K1-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
