Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+755%
91.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2022
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
4096
Shading Units
18176
256
TMUs
568
256
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
76.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
