Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 236W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+1612%
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2008
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
236W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
