Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+99%
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5.345 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2880
256
TMUs
240
256
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.5
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
