Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 285W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Boost Clock2610MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+314%
44.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
66
4096
Shading Units
8448
256
TMUs
264
256
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
285W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
76.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
