Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs ATI Radeon HD 5450 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 5450 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
4016 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 5450 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+10140%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5450 PCI
0.104 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2010
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
80
256
TMUs
8
256
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
19W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.292 billion
Unknown
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0
