Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB
+357%
48.74 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2022
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
4096
Shading Units
9728
256
TMUs
304
256
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
320W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
4 nm
Unknown
Transistors
45.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
